under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable
Instrument Act, postal receipt and postal track report in respect of
respondent No.1/company were exhibited ... During trial, the complainant proved the copy of notice, postal
receipt and postal track report in respect of respondent No.1/company.
On perusal
Laxmi Nagar, Venkatapuram Road, Lothkunta,
Secunderabad. He has also filed postal tracking report in
2 KL,J
Crl.P.No.2461_2020
proof of service ... Pursuant to the said order, the Registry has put up the postal
tracking report which shows that the notice was served on the
second respondent
Etah and requested him to help her out. As per online postal tracking report, the aforesaid letter dated 8.2.2021 has been delivered in the office ... does not intend to resign from her post. As per online postal tracking report, the aforesaid letter dated 11.2.2021 has been delivered in the office
opponent no.1 and 2. This shows on the Postal Track Report of
RPAD. (page no. 38 and 40)
d) 01/10/2022: The notice ... served to the opponent no.2.
(Postal Track Report at page no.39)
e) 07/10/2022: The notice was served to the opponent
From the RK No shown in the postal receipt
and the postal track report it goes to show that the Demand
notice is served ... document produced by the complainant i.e., the postal receipt
and the postal track report, are in respect of the first address
of the accused
Legal demand notice dated 02.12.2020 as Ex.CW1/E.
vii. Postal tracking reports of legal demand notice as Mark B.
CW-1 was duly ... record the demand notice dated
02.12.2020 (Ex-CW 1/E) and postal tracking reports
which have been marked as Mark B. The said postal
tracking
Legal demand notice dated 02.12.2020 as Ex.CW1/E.
vii. Postal tracking reports of legal demand notice as Mark B.
CW-1 was duly ... record the demand notice dated
02.12.2020 (Ex-CW 1/E) and postal tracking reports
which have been marked as Mark B. The said postal
tracking
record the demand notice dated 02.12.2020 (Ex-CW 1/E) and postal
tracking reports which have been marked as Mark B. The said postal tracking ... therefore, read in evidence. A perusal of the postal tracking reports
shows that the legal demand notice has been delivered. A perusal of the remarks
said liability within fifteen days. The complainant
had relied on the postal tracking report to contend that the notice had been
duly served ... been satisfied. The
complainant had relied solely on a postal tracking report in the absence of
acknowledgment or returned envelope, which, according to the petitioner
neither
the acknowledgment card nor the envelope had been returned, the postal
tracking report had shown the notice to have been delivered, which the
opposite ... that reliance solely on the postal tracking report could not
substitute actual proof of service, especially in the absence of any returned
acknowledgment card
