above, the Informant has stated that the OP is resorting to predatory pricing
with a view to reduce or eliminate competition in violation of Section ... cost pricing or zero price
was adopted to meet competition and social cost/ obligation cannot be considered as an
objective justification for predatory pricing
goods or service; or
(ii) price in purchase or sale (including predatory price) of
goods or service.
Explanation. ---For the purposes of this clause ... unfair or discriminatory price in
purchase or sale of goods (including predatory price) or service
referred to in sub-clause (ii) shall not include such
goods or service; or
(ii) price in purchase or sale (including predatory price) of
goods or service.
Explanation. ---For the purposes of this clause ... unfair or discriminatory price in
purchase or sale of goods (including predatory price) or service
referred to in sub-clause (ii) shall not include such
goods or service; or
(ii) price in purchase or sale (including predatory price) of
goods or service.
Explanation. ---For the purposes of this clause ... unfair or discriminatory price in
purchase or sale of goods (including predatory price) or service
referred to in sub-clause (ii) shall not include such
goods or service; or
(ii) price in purchase or sale (including predatory price) of
goods or service.
Explanation. ---For the purposes of this clause ... unfair or discriminatory price in
purchase or sale of goods (including predatory price) or service
referred to in sub-clause (ii) shall not include such
goods or service; or
(ii) price in purchase or sale (including predatory price) of
goods or service.
Explanation. -- For the purposes of this clause ... unfair or
discriminatory price in purchase or sale of goods (including
predatory price) or service referred to in sub-clause (ii)
shall not include such
Info Edge (India) Ltd vs Google India Pvt. Ltd on 19 January, 2024
Author: P
factors other than the duty structure
(i) High discount pricing
(ii) Predatory pricing
(iii) Shut down of business or industry
business commonsense.
12.1 Mr Chaudhary submitted that JRIL had consciously adopted predatory
pricing while bidding for the subject contract thereby successfully ousting
from the race
ground that the bids are
abnormally low and suffer from predatory pricing .
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order
