judis.nic.in
1/20
O.P.No.199 of 2014
2. PREFATORY NOTE:
2(i) Instant 'Original Petition ... instant OP is
predicated on lone limitation plea.
5. Broad summation of prefatory note is:
a) Contours/confines of Section 34 OP are limited
nature of the matter, deems it appropriate to set out a brief
prefatory note.
3. PREFATORY NOTE:
3(i) Konkan Railways commenced a long journey ... scope of a Section 11 petition by way of this
prefatory note, this Court deems it appropriate to also set out a short
adumbration
judis
O.P.No.363 of 2017
3. PREFATORY NOTE:
3. Challenge to an arbitral award under Section 34 of A and C Act,
going ... policy slot.
4. FACTUAL MATRIX:
4(i) In the light of aforementioned prefatory note, short facts shorn of
elaboration or in other words factual matrix
Bijesh Thomas, learned counsel for respondent are
before this Court.
2 Prefatory note :
(a) Instant 'Original Petition ... this
Court to supply emphasis and highlight)
(d) Broad summation of this prefatory note is:
i) Contours/confines of Section 34 O.P are limited
judis.nic.in
1/13
O.P.No.153 of 2020
2. PREFATORY NOTE:
2(i) Instant 'Original Petition ... time line in sub-section (6) of Section 34 .
Broad summation of prefatory note is:
a) Contours/confines of Section 34 OP are limited
read with Section 7 of A and C Act.
3. PREFATORY NOTE:
Challenge to an arbitral award under Section ... FACTUAL MATRIX IN A NUTSHELL:
4(i) In the light of aforementioned prefatory note, it is not necessary to
dilate in detail qua facts
sake of brevity,
clarity and convenience) by way of a Prefatory Note.
3. PREFATORY NOTE:
Challenge to an arbitral award under Section ... FACTUAL MATRIX IN A NUTSHELL:
4(i) In the light of aforementioned prefatory note, it is not necessary to
dilate in detail qua facts
neither tending to
enlarge or restrict them unduly. It is with these prefatory
remarks that we proceed to deal with the arguments of both
sides
neither tending to enlarge or restrict them unduly. It is with these
prefatory remarks that we proceed to deal with the arguments of both
sides
neither tending to enlarge or restrict them
unduly. It is with these prefatory remarks that we proceed to
deal with the arguments of both sides
