Index to the Judgment
S. Subject Para Nos
No.
1 A Brief Prefatory Note - The "Kerly impasse" 1 - 14
2 Facts ... AJIT
KUMAR
Signing Date:07.02.2026
11:48:46
I. A Brief Prefatory Note - The "Kerly impasse"
1. This batch of appeals presented, before
complainant or even, for that
matter, the searching officer.
21. With those prefatory remarks, the following principles
may justifiably be said to emerge, from
Novartis Ag & Anr. vs Natco Pharma Limited & Anr. on 13 December, 2021
Author
Nokia Technologies Oy vs Guangdong Oppo Mobile ... on 17 November, 2022
Author: C.Hari Shankar
JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
% 14.09.2022
A Prefatory Note
1. A bench of two Hon'ble Judges of the Supreme Court, in
Sugandhi
under Section 37(2)(b) of the 1996 Act.
24. Some prefatory observations:
25.1 It is necessary, in my view, for any court, exercising appellate
complainant or
even, for that matter, the searching officer.
13.8 With those prefatory remarks, the following principles may
justifiably be said to emerge, from
Vikram Bakshi vs State & Anr on 7 September, 2017
Author: C. Hari Shankar
Bench
SEBI (Foreign Venture Capital Investors)
Regulations, 2000 respectively.
A prefatory note
5. This Court is seized with a petition under Section 9 of the
Arbitration
2020 Page 29 of 61
15:00:10
Analysis
A prefatory note
54. Before proceeding to examine the rival contentions, one aspect
needs
