behalf of respondent No.2. Dispute is with respect to the computer proficiency
test wherein petitioner was marked zero.
2. Respondent No.1 has filed ... should in fact be marked 90 out of 100 in the Computer Proficiency Test and not
zero marks. The respondent No.1 will
said
examination.
2. Whereas Shri Sudesh was provisionally called for
Computer Proficiency Test (CPT)and interview cum personality
Test of the aforesaid examination and appeared
Assistant after the restructuring
because he had already passed the computer proficiency
test w.e.f. 7.7.2003. However, he was left out in 2003 only
were as follows:
"Constable/Head Constable Diploma/Certificate from an (Computer proficiency) institution recognised by DOE
indicating proficiency in basic data operation and working
written examination, then the successful candidates
were to participate in the Computer Proficiency Test (CPT) and finally,
the shortlisted candidates were to appear
India, to grant
the qualifying marks to the petitioner in the Computer Proficiency Test
(CPT) (Module-II) and to consequently grant the requisite post
letter dated 30.9.2013
issued the call letter to the petitioner for computer proficiency test and in which
letter with regard to furnishing ... Identity card issued by the
college etc) at the time of Computer Proficiency Test."
(underlining added)
WP(C) 5743/2014 Page
when after short listing, the
candidates are subject to Computed Proficiency Test (CPT).
3. It is the case of the petitioner that she applied
Posts/States at the time of Tier
II/Interviews/Skill Test/Computer Proficiency Test depending on
the number of vacancies available. Once the candidate
appeared in
the typing test on 5th December, 2010 and the computer proficiency test
on 9th December, 2010.
4. The petitioner was medically examined
