received INR 28,00,00,000/- from BCCI. Adopting the
profit split method prescribed under the Indian Transfer Pricing
Regulations, it had attributed revenue
received INR 28,00,00,000/- from BCCI. Adopting the
profit split method prescribed under the Indian Transfer Pricing
Regulations, it had attributed revenue
received INR 28,00,00,000/- from BCCI. Adopting the
profit split method prescribed under the Indian Transfer Pricing
Regulations, it had attributed revenue
received INR 28,00,00,000/- from BCCI. Adopting the
profit split method prescribed under the Indian Transfer Pricing
Regulations, it had attributed revenue
received INR 28,00,00,000/- from BCCI. Adopting the
profit split method prescribed under the Indian Transfer Pricing
Regulations, it had attributed revenue
received INR 28,00,00,000/- from BCCI. Adopting the
profit split method prescribed under the Indian Transfer Pricing
Regulations, it had attributed revenue
received INR 28,00,00,000/- from BCCI. Adopting the
profit split method prescribed under the Indian Transfer Pricing
Regulations, it had attributed revenue
received INR 28,00,00,000/- from BCCI. Adopting the
profit split method prescribed under the Indian Transfer Pricing
Regulations, it had attributed revenue
received INR 28,00,00,000/- from BCCI. Adopting the
profit split method prescribed under the Indian Transfer Pricing
Regulations, it had attributed revenue
resident company as decided through the use
of the Profit Split Method. As discussed above, the disposal test is
satisfied in the instant case
