filed a suit on a promissory note.
Prior to the institution of the suit, the executant of the
promissory note had filed a complaint against ... promissory notes. The
Magistrate 'acquitted the, appellants. Thereafter. the
suit on the promissory note was dismissed on the ground
that the promissory note
dismissed by the Panchayat Court on the ground that the promissory note was a forgery. Subsequent to its dismissal, a complaint with respect ... object of concocting the promissory note may not necessarily have been to institute a suit to recover money. The promissory note was concocted and kept
passing the necessary order in connection with the alleged forgery of the promissory note for Rs. 500 in the interests of justice. There was some ... genuine in a Court of Justice and that the document is a forgery. The proper course for the Sub-Magistrate under those circumstances
dismissed by the Panchayat Court on the ground that the promissory note was a forgery. Subsequent to its dismissal, a complaint with respect ... object of concocting the promissory note may not necessarily have been to institute a suit to recover money. The promissory note was concocted and kept
correct, and there is nothing like a judicial finding that the promissory-note is forged. A Court before granting sanction, ought to be satisfied that ... offence of forgery was committed by some one in respect of it.
4. As a suit was brought on the promissory-note and the note
forgery. In the second case the
complaint was filed by a private person alleging that the
accused had fabricated a promissory note and induced
present case, it follows that
the charge with regard to forgery must fail against all
appellants. The reason was that the case of Swami
Rakesh ... allegation that his thumb
impressions were obtained on blank forms of
promissory notes and receipts on 07011955 by the use
of force
necessary order in connection with the alleged forging of the promissory note for Rs. 500 in the interests of justice. There was some evidence before ... genuine in a Court of Justice and that the document is a forgery. The proper course for the Sub-Magistrate under those circumstances
Emperor vs Ramchandra Rango Sawkar on 6 October, 1938
Equivalent citations: (1939)41BOMLR98
JUDGMENT
Wassoodew
Rengaswami Reddiar vs Gunnammal on 19 August, 1965
Equivalent citations: (1967)2MLJ201
ORDER
M. Natesan
