filed a suit on a promissory note.
Prior to the institution of the suit, the executant of the
promissory note had filed a complaint against ... promissory notes. The
Magistrate 'acquitted the, appellants. Thereafter. the
suit on the promissory note was dismissed on the ground
that the promissory note
dismissed by the Panchayat Court on the ground that the promissory note was a forgery. Subsequent to its dismissal, a complaint with respect ... object of concocting the promissory note may not necessarily have been to institute a suit to recover money. The promissory note was concocted and kept
accused
persons had committed an offence of forgery by creating transfer
instruments and valuable securities/promissory notes with a view to
cheat the complainant
dismissed by the Panchayat Court on the ground that the promissory note was a forgery. Subsequent to its dismissal, a complaint with respect ... object of concocting the promissory note may not necessarily have been to institute a suit to recover money. The promissory note was concocted and kept
forgery. In the second case the
complaint was filed by a private person alleging that the
accused had fabricated a promissory note and induced
present case, it follows that
the charge with regard to forgery must fail against all
appellants. The reason was that the case of Swami
Rakesh ... allegation that his thumb
impressions were obtained on blank forms of
promissory notes and receipts on 07011955 by the use
of force
Rc No. 06(E)/2003/EowI/Cbi/Nd vs Keshav Sharma And Others And
Cbi vs . (1) Suresh Kumar Arora @ S.K.Arora on 3 January, 2017
1
IN
