Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 23 (1.46 seconds)

A.Krishnamoorthy vs L.Murugesan

appellant relied on is the suit promissory note. According to the appellant, the suit promissory note is not only signed by the respondent/defendant ... defendant has stated that the promissory note is a rank forgery and the promissory note has to be sent to the Government Handwriting & Finger
Madras High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ravi vs Jothi

bound to repay the sum of Rs.3,88,000/- towards promissory note executed by the defendant being ... unsigned promissory note to the plaintiff’s husband. On the contrary, the defence taken was that the promissory note has been created by forgery
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P T Asha - Full Document

K.Meenakumari vs K.N.Prasad

denied the execution of the promissory note. Therefore, it is for the plaintiff to first establish that the promissory note ... promissory note, she has not led any evidence whatsoever in support of the said contention of forgery. On the other hand,the plaintiff had examined
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Suresh Kumar vs Sivagami

promissory notes. Exs.B3 and B4, promissory notes show that Kathirvelu is in the habit of getting signature of the appellant in promissory notes ... promissory notes. His wife has not signed in Exs.A1 to A7 promissory notes and they are forged signatures and it amounts to material

Ragina Beevi vs Arasan

execution of a promissory note and also denied the borrowing of Rs.70,000/- on 05.09.2004 and execution of promissory note. It is specifically denied ... still pending. Due to that enmity, appellants have created suit promissory notes by playing forgery and filed the suit and they are not entitled

S.Karunakaran vs S.Ramalingam

Promissory Note. He has also denied the plaintiff's case that the contents of the promissory note were written by him to the dictation ... promissory note has been denied by him. The respondent/plaintiff has adduced oral and documentary evidence to the effect that the suit promissory note

A.Thilgam vs K.Kannan

filed on the basis of promissory note. The respondent/plaintiff filed the suit on the basis of promissory note for recovery ... executed the promissory note. The promissory note is a rank forgery. The suit is filed by the respondent taking advantage of the demise of Ashokan

Sunny Mathew vs John

suit filed by the respondent. The suit is based on a promissory note allegedly executed by the petitioners who are husband and wife. The contention ... promissory note was written up on it and signature of the wife seen in the promissory note is a forgery. The petitioners filed an application
Kerala High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - K Mathew - Full Document

Febin K Xavier vs State Of Kerala

which, after investigation, final report was filed. Further, since the disputed promissory note has not been sent for expert opinion, an application was filed ... form of an expert opinion that the signature found in the promissory note appears to be not that of the complainant. Whether that is correct
1   2 3 Next