petitioner had filed the civil suit based on the
forgery promissory note. The forged promissory note is produced
by the 1st petitioner. The first petitioner ... demand for the promissory note dated 15.06.2009 by A1. It is
clearly mentioned that R2 executed the promissory note in favour
of the 1st petitioner
petitioner had filed the civil suit based on the
forgery promissory note. The forged promissory note is produced
by the 1st petitioner. The first petitioner ... demand for the promissory note dated 15.06.2009 by A1. It is
clearly mentioned that R2 executed the promissory note in favour
of the 1st petitioner
After receipt of the expert opinion confirming the forgery committed in
the promissory notes and Deed of Mortgage, the 2nd respondent lodged
the complaint. Hence ... committed in the promissory notes and Mortgage of Deed. One
thing is certain that in this case, signature found in promissory notes and
Mortgage
written several promissory notes for the borrowal of
loan by the second petitioner. He also signed as a witness in the
promissory note by affixing ... allegation of cheating, committing forgery or
cheating a false document does not arise. Further, the alleged
promissory notes were not produced during the investigation
pursue its remedies against those guilty
of fraud and forgery and those guilty of negligence. In so
far as the judgment in M.S. Anirudhan ... suit was
based against the principal debtor based on a promissory
note executed by him in favour of the bank and against the
surety
Sanjay Bhandari & Anr vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 29 June, 2015
Author: Manmohan
Shashi Goil & Anr vs State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 9
Pramod Goil vs State Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi & Anr. on 9 February, 2016
A Ramanuja vs State By Cbi on 18 December, 2020
Author: H.P.Sandesh
Bench
N.Sekar vs State Rep By on 2 November, 2018
Author: P.N.Prakash
Bench
