Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 137 (0.57 seconds)

N. Srinivasan vs Muthammal on 29 January, 1998

promissory note on 17.11.1992, and that the suit promissory note has been filed after correcting the month on which the suit promissory had been executed ... promissory note was not his own, and that therefore, he came to realise that the suit promissory note was a rank piece of forgery
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 15 - Full Document

Dhanalakshmi vs K.K.Velusamy on 6 October, 2015

passed on the promissory note. Even in the written statemnet the defendants have made a specific line that the promissory note is forged and fabricated ... forgery. The document filed by the deceased before the Income Tax Department and proof affidavit dated 07.02.2003 are seven years old than the promissory note
Madras High Court Cites 3 - Cited by 1 - Full Document

Ravi vs Jothi

bound to repay the sum of Rs.3,88,000/- towards promissory note executed by the defendant being ... unsigned promissory note to the plaintiff’s husband. On the contrary, the defence taken was that the promissory note has been created by forgery
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 0 - P T Asha - Full Document

Suresh Kumar vs Sivagami

promissory notes. Exs.B3 and B4, promissory notes show that Kathirvelu is in the habit of getting signature of the appellant in promissory notes ... promissory notes. His wife has not signed in Exs.A1 to A7 promissory notes and they are forged signatures and it amounts to material

Ragina Beevi vs Arasan

execution of a promissory note and also denied the borrowing of Rs.70,000/- on 05.09.2004 and execution of promissory note. It is specifically denied ... still pending. Due to that enmity, appellants have created suit promissory notes by playing forgery and filed the suit and they are not entitled

Sathi Eswara Babu, vs Smt. Sathi Sridevi, on 20 October, 2023

forged the suit promissory note and subsequently initiated the suit; no valid consideration had been exchanged for the forged promissory note; the plaintiff ... alleged promissory note. 6. Based on the above pleadings, the trial Court framed the following issues: (1) Whether the suit promissory note dated 21.07.2007 created
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

The Appeal vs D. Rasool Naik2 on 10 August, 2023

promissory note in favour of the plaintiff. As the defendants did not choose to pay the due amount under the above promissory note, despite repeated ... lend such a huge amount to them; the suit promissory note is a rank forgery which was brought into existence with the help of scribe
Andhra Pradesh High Court - Amravati Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next