suit Promissory Note in favour of the plaintiff. The defendant further submitted that the alleged suit Promissory Note was a rank forgery ... suit Promissory Note Ex.A.1 executed by the defendant. But, the defendant has denied the execution of the said suit Promissory Note
against the petitioner herein on 10.10.2011, alleging an act of forgery on promissory note, on the basis of the findings given by the Civil Court
above said suit for recovery of money based on a promissory note dated 25.6.1995 alleged to have been executed by the appellant herein ... known to him and that the suit promissory note was a rank forgery. In order to prove his case, the respondent herein/plaintiff, besides examining
suit for recovery of money based on Ex.A.1
promissory note, stated to have been executed by the defendants in favour of
Grace Mary ... identity of plaintiff's late wife. Suit
promissory note is a rank forgery. It was forged by plaintiff, a fraud and a
drug addict
passing of consideration would be applicable
only when the execution of promissory note is admitted and not when the
execution is disputed and proved later ... defendant disputed the claim on the ground that;
a)Promissory Note is a rank forgery.
b)Plaintiff has no wherewithal to lend such a huge
promissory note-Ex.A.1. However, the
appellant/defendant denied his execution of the promissory note. He alleged
that it is a rank forgery ... suit on promissory note.
19. In the face of the available evidence on record, the execution of
the promissory note has been established. In such
executed the suit promissory note
Ex.A.1, that the alleged suit promissory note is forged. D.W.1 has
contended that the signature found ... attestor of Ex.A.1, promissory note,
while the defendant has raised plea of forgery in the written statement.
_______________
Page
found in the suit promissory note is not his signature and on the other hand, it is a rank forgery.
3. The suit ... papers are also perused.
5. The suit is based on a promissory note allegedly executed by the petitioner herein jointly with another person by name
plaints, is that the defendant executed the suit promissory notes on 06.3.1995, 01.12.1993, 01.6.1994 and 09.7.1995 respectively after borrowing ... father-in-law and the attestor in all the four promissory notes is one Vijayakumar, who is the nephew of the defendant.
8. From
cheating and thereby dishonestly inducing delivery of
property, Section 468 relates to forgery for the purpose of cheating, Section
470 relates to using as genuine ... forged
and Section 471 relates to the forged document is a promissory note of the
central government. The averments in the complaint and the statement
