accused towards the complainant stands
established in view of promissory note Ex.CX which has
been executed by the accused in favour of the complainant ... Counsel for the accused has argued that the said
promissory note was never executed by the accused. It has
been argued on behalf
plaintiff and defendants, nor there is
any hoondi, agreement or promissory note, executed by
defendants, on the basis of which, plaintiff can file the suit ... never
purchased, accepted or acknowledged, the said goods
through alleged bills. The forgery and fabrication on the said
bills are very much clear, as same
25 vs Chetan Sharma & Others. Page No.: 25 Of ... on 19 November, 2015
:1
Complainant vs . on 23 May, 2015
IN THE COURT OF SHRI PUNEET PAHWA
METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE
Girish S/O Late Sh. Shiv Shankar vs Sangeeta Meena W/O Sh. Anil Meena
came to the conclusion that appellant had failed to prove any
forgery.
12. Reliance of learned counsel for the appellant on Sanjay Mishra ... such opinion. Appellant had examined this witness to show
that the promissory note was not executed by her. But evidence
present suit is liable to be dismissed or that there is any
forgery on the part of the plaintiff. It is stated that plaintiff ... plaintiff at any point of time and there is no such
promissory note.
11. It is further denied that the plaintiff ever said
Cr No.02/15 " Subhash Chander vs . State & Anr." on 13 July
