appear as though it is a promissory note. According to him, the
promissory note is a forgery and it is not enforceable. The
appropriate issue ... Whether the promissory note sued upon by the
plaintiff is true and valid and not vitiated as forgery
contended by the defendant
trial court rejecting a
plea for despatch of the promissory note containing a revenue stamp to
assess the date of the issue of stamp ... have taken a plea that the signatures contained in the
promissory note is forgery and their father had never signed the same, a
mere despatch
executed a promissory note in favour of
the plaintiff and the thumb impression is a forgery. It is also his
contention that if the thumb ... including issue No.7 which is to the effect whether the promissory
note obtained by the plaintiff is result of fraud placing the onus
money alleged to have been
borrowed by the defendant on a promissory note dated 04.01.1979
Kumar Sanjeev
2013.09.12 10:08
I attest to the accuracy ... defendant denied the
execution of the promissory note and contended that the document
was a forgery. His contention was that he used to sign only
basis of promissory note and it has not properly appreciated the
contention that the promissory note was a forgery.
3. At the time of suit ... dated 03.10.2013.
4. If the decision regarding the genuineness of the promissory
note has come to the finality through the decision of this Court, then
defendant who had a case to contend that promissory
note was a forgery was met with a report through an expert given by the
plaintiff
forgery was on the defendant. It is erroneous. If the defence is that the
promissory note is forged, the onus of proof is still
