executed a
promissory note for the same.
3.The defence of the petitioner was that the promissory note is a
rank forgery and no such ... defence of the revision petitioner is that the promissory
note is a rank forgery and that he has not executed the same. To prove
under the promissory
note dated 29.04.2011.
3.The defence of the petitioner was that the promissory note was a
rank forgery and not executed ... statement itself, stated that his
signature in the suit promissory note is a rank forgery. It is no doubt true
that
bound to repay the sum of Rs.3,88,000/-
towards promissory note executed by the defendant
being ... unsigned promissory note to the plaintiff’s husband. On the contrary, the
defence taken was that the promissory note has been created by forgery
security of promissory notes. On 14.10.1994 the defendant
acknowledging that he owed a sum of Rs.33,500/- had executed a
promissory note agreeing ... execution of Ex.A.4 and Ex.A.5 promissory notes
and the suit promissory note had been executed only for the
outstanding amounts both
security of promissory notes. On 14.10.1994 the defendant
acknowledging that he owed a sum of Rs.33,500/- had executed a
promissory note agreeing ... execution of Ex.A.4 and Ex.A.5 promissory notes
and the suit promissory note had been executed only for the
outstanding amounts both
from the
plaintiff is a blatant lie and the promissory note is a rank forgery. The
defendant had denied her signature in the promissory note
witnesses and had executed a promissory note for the said sum,
agreeing to repay the same on demand, together with interest at the rate ... alleged
promissory note which copy have not been served to them till now.
The promissory note is a rank forgery and fabricated with an intent
needs and on
the same day itself, he had executed a promissory note agreeing to repay the
same with interest at the rate ... executed the
promissory note, had not borrowed the money and the signature found therein is
a rank forgery. In the written statement itself, the defendants
matters concerning the family. The 5th respondent would
submit that the promissory note which is the cause of action ... judis/
suit C.S.No.413 of 2020 is a rank forgery and the same had not been
executed by the deceased 1st defendant. They
A.V.Munusamy vs K.Kalyani on 31 October, 2022
Author: P.T. Asha
Bench
