petitioner had filed the civil suit based on the
forgery promissory note. The forged promissory note is produced
by the 1st petitioner. The first petitioner ... demand for the promissory note dated 15.06.2009 by A1. It is
clearly mentioned that R2 executed the promissory note in favour
of the 1st petitioner
petitioner had filed the civil suit based on the
forgery promissory note. The forged promissory note is produced
by the 1st petitioner. The first petitioner ... demand for the promissory note dated 15.06.2009 by A1. It is
clearly mentioned that R2 executed the promissory note in favour
of the 1st petitioner
suit
promissory note . His further contention is that, he does not know who
the plaintiff is and that the suit promissory note ... execution of the promissory note. He has mentioned in an unequivocal
term that the suit promissory note is a rank forgery both in the reply
suit
promissory note . His further contention is that, he does not know who
the plaintiff is and that the suit promissory note ... execution of the
promissory note. He has mentioned in an unequivocal term that the suit
promissory note is a rank forgery both in the reply
under the promissory
note dated 29.04.2011.
3.The defence of the petitioner was that the promissory note was a
rank forgery and not executed ... statement itself, stated that his
signature in the suit promissory note is a rank forgery. It is no doubt true
that
along
with interest on the foot of promissory note. The petitioner herein
filed written statement and contested the suit. The trial in the suit
was commenced ... borrowed any amount from the respondent /
plaintiff and the suit promissory note is rank forgery one.
Therefore, it is necessary to send the suit promissory
identity of plaintiff's late wife. Suit promissory note is a rank
forgery. It was forged by plaintiff, a fraud and a drug addict
identity of plaintiff's late wife. Suit promissory note is a rank
forgery. It was forged by plaintiff, a fraud and a drug addict
prayed for on 28.10.2024.
31. Though the Respondents have disputed the promissory notes as
well as the Memorandum of Understanding on the grounds of fabrication ... from a consortium and they are not aware of
how the promissory notes went to the Applicant and in another breadth
they contend that they
contention of the defendants that
they did not execute the suit promissory note and that
they did not hand over the documents towards security ... judis
(ii) Whether the contention that the suit
promissory note is a forgery is correct ?”.
Both the issues were answered in favour of the plaintiff
