provided by the respondent. The appellant alleged that as per RBI promotion policy
of 2012, relaxations were applicable only till the year 2016. Hence
change in the promotion policy
communicated vide circular dated 16.03.2009 is
illegal as there is no prior sanction of the RBI /
Government of India ... seniority of employees of the
transferor bank for promotion prior approval /
sanction of RBI / Central Government is required,
cannot be accepted. There is no substance
Reserve Bank of India (short the Bank), is aggrieved of his non-promotion to Class-III cadre on the post of Assistant Care Taker ... suitability for promotion as Assistant Care Taker assessable under RBI's Master Circular on Promotion Policy for Class-III and IV employees issued
Group-C scale could be considered as skilled artisan in 25% of promotion quota but this will only apply to casual labour engaged purely ... vacancies reserved for departmental promotion from the Semi Skilled category.
Further the Railway Board vide letter/circular dated 09.04.1997 RBI No.53/97, casual labour
Sonali Pramod Dhawde vs Central Bank Of India on 1 April, 2013
Bench: A.M
Banking Business Facilitators ... vs The Chairman State Bank Of India & Ors on 30 November
Sonali Pramod Dhawde vs Central Bank Of India on 1 April, 2013
Bench: A.M
Banking Business Facilitators ... vs The Chairman, State Bank Of India & Ors on 30 November
next promotional post was of General Manager and the petitioner was denied promotion for the years 1997, 1998 and 1999. The petitioner contends that such ... outstanding work. However, the said report was not disclosed even to RBI. In the said report, he had pointed out, a huge default running into
next promotional
post was of General Manager and the petitioner was denied promotion for the
years 1997, 1998 and 1999. The petitioner contends that such ... outstanding work. However, the said
report was not disclosed even to RBI. In the said report, he had pointed out,
a huge default running into