Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

M/S.Devi Traders vs The State Tax Officer (Inspection) 5 on 24 January, 2025

petitioner failed to produce the list of the customers and the details of the sellers showing that the transactions claimed by the petitioner had been ... further submitted that the petitioner has not provided any quantitative detail of stock during the entire assessment proceedings to prove that the disallowed purchases

Amount Allowable as Deduction in Schedule BP ii. Non-Furnishing of Quantitative Details iii. Investment/Advances/Loans iv. Refund Claim v. Sales Turnover/Receipts

Form-3CD, the petitioner has not furnished the quantitative details of trading time also and therefore there is purely failure on the part

Form-3CD, the petitioner has not furnished the quantitative details of trading time also and therefore there is purely failure on the part

periods “from 01.04.2008 to 20.10.2008” and “from 21.10.2008 to 31.03.2009” showing details of purchases, instead of furnishing trading accounts for the required periods ... submitted that as seen from Clause 28 of form 3CD, quantitative details of the principal items of raw materials, finished products and by-products, details

Applicable else may be deleted while floating the tender) Illustration: Calculation of Quantitative SOR in Absolute Terms based on Actual QTY Handled during the contract ... Operation details SOR Rate (Rs. Volume handled in 24 months Total value of Per MT) work done (Inclusive of No. of bags Quantity (Rs.) (exluding

M/S.Unik Traders vs The Additional Commissioner Of Customs on 29 November, 2021 Author

The Institute Of Franciscan ... vs The Commissioner on 14 March, 2022 Author: C.Saravanan Bench

M/S.Parle Agro Pvt. Ltd vs Union Of India on 22 December, 2018 Author