answer would bring the witness within the proviso.
9. In The Queen v. Gopal Doss ... Walsh, J., in Emperor v. Ganga Sahai (1920) I.L.R. 42 A. 257 did not consider The Queen v. Gopal Doss
Judges who composed the Full Bench in the case of The Queen v. Gopal Doss (1), decided by the Madras High Court ... majority of the Judges in the case of The Queen v. Gopal Doss I.L.R., 3 Mad., 271, and would admit the evidence. Reading
R.Dineshkumar @ Deena vs State Rep. By on 13 November, 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT
Devappal Halageri v. State of Karnataka [Cr Petition 101791 of 2014]
10
The Queen v. Gopal Doss and another [ILR 3 Madras ... discussion before a 5-Judge Bench of this Court in Queen v. Gopal Doss and another [ILR 3 Madras 271], in which three Judges held
placed heavy reliance on a decision in the
case of The Queen v. Gopal Doss & Another , ILR 3 Mad. 271 and other
judgments
right decision." (per Turner C. J. in The Queen v. Gopal Doss, ILR 3 Mad 271 (279-280) (FB)).
The rigour of the rule
answers which he has given. On the authority of Queen-Empress v. Ganu Sonba (1883) I.L.R. 12 Bom. 440, therefore, the accused would ... Full Bench as against the remaining two dissenting in The Queen v. Gopal Doss (1881) I.L.R. 3 Mad. 271, F.b.. They
taken in Queen-Empress v. Babaji [1892] 17 Bom. 127 and Queen-Empress v. Balkrishna Vithal [1893] 17 Bom. 573 in favour of the absolute ... Ganga Sahai [1920] 42 All. 257. On the order hand in Queen v. Gopal Doss [1881] 3 Mad. 271 (F.B.); Queen-Empress v. Moss
considered by a Fall Bench of the Madras High Court in Queen v. Gopal Doss 3 M 271 : 1 Weir ... Chief Justice of this Court in the case of Queen Empress v. Moss
Bench of the Madras High Court in a case of the Queen v. Gopal Doss I.L.R. 3 Mad. 271. There three Judges held ... held that it was admissible, and one that it was not; Queen-Empress v. Ganu Sonba I.L.R. 12 Bom. 440.
24. We think
