date of receipt of a copy of this order. Mr. R.F. Nariman, learned senior counsel assures us that his client shall not take ... dated 3.7.2006 in W.P.M.P. No. 4556/2006
6. Mr. R. Krishnamoorthy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners would contend that inasmuch
12015 of 2021
20.The decision in R.Rajagopal has been affirmed by the 9-judge bench
in K.S Puttaswamy’s case. In fact ... himself and Khehar, C.J, Agrawal and Nazeer, JJ) and R.F Nariman, J expressly
cite and approve the aforesaid principles from R.Rajagopal
Division Bench
of the Apex Court, Hon'ble Mr.Justice R.F.Nariman in paragraphs 15 and 17 has
observed as under
abovesaid judgment is extracted hereunder:
"24. Shri R.F. Nariman, learned Solicitor General argued that the power vested in the Authority to make Regulations
12015 of 2021
20.The decision in R.Rajagopal has been affirmed by the 9-judge bench
in K.S Puttaswamy’s case. In fact ... himself and Khehar, C.J, Agrawal and Nazeer, JJ) and R.F Nariman, J expressly
cite and approve the aforesaid principles from R.Rajagopal
abovesaid judgment is extracted hereunder:
"24. Shri R.F. Nariman, learned Solicitor General argued that the power vested in the Authority to make Regulations
interpretation of statutes was set out, the concurring judgment of R.F. Nariman, J., after an exhaustive survey of the relevant case law, came
Old No.157 vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 5 January, 2011
Author: Vinod
interpretation of statutes was set out, the concurring judgment of R.F. Nariman, J., after an exhaustive survey of the relevant case law, came
were filed in the wake of the aforesaid judgment. While
Justice R.F.Nariman took the view that there is no merit in the Review
