sentence of rigorous imprisonment for life. Appellants Ram Parvesh Ram, Bilash Ram and Dasrath Ram have further been convicted under Section 148 of the Indian ... caste, are inter se related. Appellants Bilash Ram and Kabilash Ram are ions of appellant Ram Naik Ram and the other appellants are their agnates
Ram Naik and others]
~:;i;i;_ ape {cri} 2053 {in the case ef Bhimappa
T. 'fifaganur xx Siate Qf Karnataka
Emperor A.I.R. 1930 Rang 354, Ramchandra Naik v. Emperor A.I.R. 1947 Pat 428, Indore State v. Balwant Singh
accused or affects the
creditability of the prosecution version. In
Ram Dev v. State of U.P., 1995 Supp (1) SCC
547, it was noted ... Delhi Admn.), (2000) 2 SCC 646,
Bahadur Naik v. State of Bihar, (2000) 9 SCC
153, and Ram Gulam Chaudhary v. State of
Bihar
Babu Ram is a witness of circumstances, seizure memo
and Fard Superdnama; PW 8 Jagan Nath is a witness of circumstances and seizure
of dead ... Delhi Administration ) (200
(2) SCC 646), Bahadur Naik v. State of Bihar (2000 (9) SCC 153) and Ram
Gulam Chaudhury and others v. State
Maharashtra on 24 April, 2019
Author: Prakash D. Naik
Bench: B.P. Dharmadhikari , Prakash D. Naik
bdp 1/11 ca-262.2017.doc
IN THE HIGH ... BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 262 of 2017
Sagar Dhondiram Pawar ... Appellant
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
.......
Mr. Rushikesh Kale
accused or affects the creditability of
the prosecution version. In Ram Dev and Anr. v. State of U.P. ,
[1995] Supp ... Delhi administration, [2000] 2
SCC 646, Bahadur Naik v. State of Bihar, [2000] 9 SCC 153 and,
Ram Gulam Chaudhury and Ors. v. State
Ram dated 24.10.2011
7
staying in Delhi Math for last four months for treatment of fractured arm .
He identified the accused Jai Ram ... Shrabana Kumar Naik who conducted post mortem and
Page 7 / 24 of Judgment State Vs. Jai Ram dated 24.10.2011
8
gave the secondary opinion about
statement in paragraph no. 11 has stated that besides Ram Lal and Ram Lakhan there was no other person in the nearby houses who could ... Apex Court in the case of Maruti Rama Naik Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2003) 10 SCC 670 in paragraph no. 7 has observed
ground for disbelieving eye witnesses. Again in the case
of Behadur Naik vs State of Bihar , AIR 2000 SC 1582, it was held ... Similar view has been taken by the
Supreme Court in the case Ram Ghulam Choudhary vs State of Bihar AIR
2011 SC 2842.
21. Coming
