since 1966 between Ram Bharose (P.W.1) - the father
of the deceased Komal Ram and the accused Ram Naik, wherein
Ram Bharose had succeeded ... three accused persons and an unidentified person
standing surrounding Komal Ram. Accused Ram Naik was armed
with a gandasa (a butchers heavy knife, also used
since 1966 between Ram Bharose (P.W.1) - the father
of the deceased Komal Ram and the accused Ram Naik, wherein
Ram Bharose had succeeded ... three accused persons and an unidentified person
standing surrounding Komal Ram. Accused Ram Naik was armed
with a gandasa (a butchers heavy knife, also used
Uttam S/O. Sitaram Naik vs The State Of Maharashtra on 28 January, 2022
Author: C.V. Bhadang
Bench: C.V. Bhadang ... APPLICATION NO. 207 OF 2022
SNEHA
NITIN
CHAVAN Uttam s/o Sitaram Naik ..Applicant
Digitally signed
by SNEHA NITIN
V/s.
CHAVAN
Date
accused Brijlal and Kashi Ram came there and gave
abuses to the complainant Mohan Ram Naik, PW 1, who
was also sitting outside his house ... Kashi
Ram, Mohanlal got himself hidden in the flour mill of
Milkha Singh. After leaving the house by Mohanlal PW
15, Mohan Ram Naik
Yudhishthir Ramchandra Naik vs The State Of Maharashtra on 15 March, 2021
Author: Prakash D. Naik
Bench: Prakash D. Naik ... BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1769 OF 2020
Yudhishthir Ramchandra Naik ... Applicant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent
.....
Mr. Prabhanjay R. Dave, Advocate
Vinit S/O. Ramchandra Naik And Others vs The State Of Maharashtra Thr. Police ... on 30 January, 2019
Author: S.B. Shukre
Bench ... CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) No.515 OF 2018
1. Vinit s/o. Ramchandra Naik,
Age 32 years,
Occupation : Business.
2. Kalpana w/o. Ramchandra Naik
accused persons, with the help of Kansa Naik (PW 13) and Rama Naik (PW 14, two Grama Rakshis, who had come on duty ... disclose as to what had happened. He asked the Grama Rakshi Ram Naik (PW 14) to go to Sikargochha in the morning to the house
decision rendered in the case of Surender Pratap v. Ram Naik and Ors. , AIR 2001 SC 164, wherein Their Lordships of the Apex Court ruled
Louis hired the services of a retired Government officer PW 12 Gangaram Naik who had retired from the office of the District Inspect of Land ... office of DILR i.e. PW 12. Accordingly PW 12 Gangaram Naik, a private surveyor, came to land survey No. 196 for the purpose
doubt.
9. AIR 2001 SCC 164 ( Surendra Pratap Chauhari v. Ram Naik and Ors. ). That was the case where evidence of eye witness was believed
