them to bring challan receipts refusing to receive the US $ and the two passengers gave the names and passport numbers and the two passengers names
Road, Opp. Passport Office, Worli, Mumbai 400 025 on 16/04/2010 and the postal cover was returned back the remarks refused. Thereafter, the departmental
mentioned in the seizure panchanama dated 8.1.1996. That the officers of AIU refused to accept the sale note produced by Akhtar is a concocted story ... fabricated document. Had it been genuine, it would have shown Akhtars passport number and full address for easy identification. The name SHAIKH MOHD. AKHTAR
City &Amp; Industrial Development ... vs Commr.Service Tax- Vii Mumbai on 5 August, 2019
Commissioner Of Customs (Prev.), ... vs Shri Mazaharul Haq (In Appeal No.70119) on 20 June
City &Amp; Industrial Development ... vs Commr.Service Tax- Ii Mumbai on 5 August, 2019
City &Amp; Industrial Development ... vs Commr.Service Tax- Vii Mumbai on 5 August, 2019
City &Amp; Industrial Development ... vs Commissioner Of Service Tax Mumbai-Ii on 5 August
City &Amp; Industrial Development ... vs Commissioner Of Service Tax Mumbai-Ii on 5 August
From What We Have Indicated Above And On ... vs 4.4 Investigation Revealed That A ... on