despite having
been served with a notice by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi
(MCD) and despite notice by a Local Commissioner (LC) appointed ... issued by the LC appointed by the Delhi
High Court, no action was taken by the MCD. This portion of the
news item
DELHI 15, (2015) 216 DLT 115
Author: Vibhu Bakhru
Bench: Vibhu Bakhru
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Judgment delivered ... passed by the Officer on Special Duty of
the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD),imposing "damages" at the rate
activity' under the
relevant provisions of Master Plan of Delhi-2021 and
Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 ?
CS(OS) No.1724/2014 Page ... Delhi
Municipal Corporation Act, 1957. Based on the premise that the
permission dated 31st December, 2013 issued by the MCD is illegal
Pramod Arora vs Honble Lt. Governor Of Delhi And Ors. on 3 April, 2014
Author
DELHI
Judgment Reserved on January 10 , 2014
Judgment Delivered on January 20, 2014
+ W.P.(C) 8144/2007
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ..... Petitioner
Represented ... working against a regular nature of job. The petitioner
Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) filed a reply wherein it admitted
the fact that
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ RSA No. 120/2001 & CM No.6310/2011
% 28th January,2014
M.C.D. ......Appellant.
Through ... liable to pay property tax under Section 120 of the Delhi
Municipal Corporation Act (in short ' DMC Act '), 1957?
3. Whether the occupier
Four Crores and Fifty Lakhs only) paid by
NHAI, Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and taxes relating
to payments to NHAI and MCD ... 2013 is concerned, the
same has been filed by South Delhi Municipal Corporation of Delhi under
Order 1 Rule 10 CPC for its impleadment
DELHI 48
Author: Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
Bench: Chief Justice , Rajiv Sahai Endlaw
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Date of decision: 10th ... appellant from shop No.122, Yashwant
Place, New Delhi.
3. Counsel for the respondent NDMC appeared when this appeal came up
first before
HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% DECIDED ON: 03.11.2014
+ W.P. (C) 587/2011
MCD AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mrs. Biji Rajesh ... RAVINDRA BHAT, J. (OPEN COURT)
1. The petitioner, i.e., the MCD claims to be aggrieved by the order of
the Central Administrative
Kait
Bench: Suresh Kait
$~R32
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
% Judgment delivered on:16th September ... 2011
MOH. SHAKEEL AKHTAR ..... Petitioner
Represented by:Mr. Rajiv Aggarwal,
Adv.
Versus
MCD ..... Respondent
Represented by:Ms. Saroj Bidawat,
Adv.
CORAM
