RERA. If
section 31 of the RERA is read to mean that complaints only in respect of
registered projects can be entertained by Regulatory Authority ... provisions of RERA cannot be selectively interpreted to suit individual
grievance of Appellant. Though RERA takes within its fold even ongoing
projects under first Proviso
RERA. If
section 31 of the RERA is read to mean that complaints only in respect of
registered projects can be entertained by Regulatory Authority ... provisions of RERA cannot be selectively interpreted to suit individual
grievance of Appellant. Though RERA takes within its fold even ongoing
projects under first Proviso
regulating the transactions of ongoing
projects and compelling promoters of such projects to get the project
registered under RERA from the date of notification ... unconstitutional to compel the promoters of the ongoing projects to
register their projects under RERA by applying provisions of RERA
retrospectively. The learned counsel submits
project and the registration of the project is sought only
in respect of some of its components. Moreover, registration of the
project under the RERA ... registration of only part of the
project, the Appellant has registered the entire project under the RERA
and availed the benefits thereunder. Now by refusing
regulating the transactions of ongoing
projects and compelling promoters of such projects to get the project
registered under RERA from the date of notification ... unconstitutional to compel the promoters of the ongoing projects to
register their projects under RERA by applying provisions of RERA
retrospectively. The learned counsel submits
regulating the transactions of ongoing
projects and compelling promoters of such projects to get the project
registered under RERA from the date of notification ... unconstitutional to compel the promoters of the ongoing projects to
register their projects under RERA by applying provisions of RERA
retrospectively. The learned counsel submits
regulating the transactions of ongoing
projects and compelling promoters of such projects to get the project
registered under RERA from the date of notification ... unconstitutional to compel the promoters of the ongoing projects to
register their projects under RERA by applying provisions of RERA
retrospectively. The learned counsel submits
regulating the transactions of ongoing
projects and compelling promoters of such projects to get the project
registered under RERA from the date of notification ... unconstitutional to compel the promoters of the ongoing projects to
register their projects under RERA by applying provisions of RERA
retrospectively. The learned counsel submits
regulating the transactions of ongoing
projects and compelling promoters of such projects to get the project
registered under RERA from the date of notification ... unconstitutional to compel the promoters of the ongoing projects to
register their projects under RERA by applying provisions of RERA
retrospectively. The learned counsel submits
project and the registration of the project is sought only
in respect of some of its components. Moreover, registration of the
project under the RERA ... registration of only part of the
project, the Appellant has registered the entire project under the RERA
and availed the benefits thereunder. Now by refusing
