Settlement (Revenue Department) is mandatory in
case of any transaction, sanction of building plans
or unlocking of Khatian (RoR) to be initiated against
the Enemy
which
requires proving of title. But here in the given case, save and
except ROR which does not confer any title, the Learned Trial
Court ... inadmissible.
17. In the case in hand, what is before the court is
the khatian i.e. ROR which was created in the name
correct."
Here in this case there is no any contrary
evidence on record against the finally published ROR.
14. Further, I would like ... challenge the ROR within
one year from the date of publication of the ROR.
15. Here in the given case, there is no such evidence
instant case would
form the foundation as regards to determination of caste status
of the petitioners since RORs are found to be not reliable ... remarks are tampered and by whom. In case any words or
contents of the RORs are corrected, there must be adequate
"note" under
possession of the third party, but
in some cases the record of rights (ROR) cannot be the final
evidence for purpose of determining the possession ... this court, do not have
any relevance in the context of the case.
13. From the other side, Mr. D. Bhattacharya, learned
counsel appearing
prove his own case. According to Mr. Lodh, learned counsel, the
plaintiffs have failed to prove their own case for the reason that ... inadmissible.
17. In the case in hand, what is before the court is the khatian i.e.
ROR which was created in the name
that on
the basis of that hand note they obtained the ROR i.e
Khatian No.837 dated 20.10.92. But it sounds absurd ... defendant-appellants.
In the case law vide (1998) 3 GLR.119 it was held
that the entry in ROR
seizure list
23. P-14(i) to ROR
14(ii)/PW/20
24. P-15/PW/20 Seizure list ... defence.
10. PW1 is the informant-cum-victim of this case. She
deposed on oath that in the year 2019, she came in contact
with
name of said
Sukhamoy Paul in the following manner in the ROR:
Old CS plot nos. Revisional CS plot nos. Classification Quantum
213 part ... Accordingly, vide mutation case no.73/94, the mutation authority allowed
mutation in favour of the appellant-plaintiff and a separate ROR was
prepared
thereafter the
plaintiff applied for mutation but due to non-availability of ROR which
has been send to Agartala for computerization, the petition for mutation ... relied on the ROR
revenue Records and claimed that the suit needs to be dismissed. It is
the case of the defendants that the revenue