Chandigarh
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed by
ANITA MALHOTRA
Date: 2019.03.28
in RSA ... find that the High
Court though disposed of bunch of second appeals
(RSA Nos.2066 to 2068 of 1987 and RSA
will dated 5 th
January, 1973 was validly executed and in RSA No. 933/1984, the
validity of the will dated 5th January ... separate proceedings initiated
in reference to will dated 5th January, 1973 in RSA No. 933/1984
decided on 28th July, 2004 held to be validly
Appeal has been filed to challenge the Order
dated 13.11.2018 passed in RSA No. 1354 of 2014 by the
Signature Not Verified
Digitally signed ... Aggrieved by the aforesaid Order, Respondent Nos. 1, 2
& 3 filed RSA No. 1354 of 2014 before the Punjab &
Haryana High Court
Ravinder Kaur Grewal vs Manjit Kaur on 7 August, 2019
Equivalent citations: (2019) 3 ICC
passed by the High Court
of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in RSA No.1537 of
1993 whereby the Single Judge of the High Court
special leave is directed against the judgment and decree
dated 06.11.2007 in RSA No. 260 of 1995 whereby, the High Court of Himachal
Pradesh ... allowed in the manner that the judgment
and decree dated 06.11.2007 in RSA No. 260 of 1995 is set aside but the
said appeal
dated 14.11.2007 passed by the High Court
of Karnataka at Bangalore in RSA No. 23 of 2005
whereby the High Court partly allowed the appeal
whereby the High Court allowed the
RSA filed by the respondents herein and order dated
26.04.2017 in CM(Application) No.46865 of 2016 by
which
appeal filed by KS in the High Court (being RSA No.338
of 1953), the High Court vide judgment dated 07.08.1959,
remanded the matter ... filed by KS was dismissed by the first appellate
court on 31.07.1970. RSA No.545 of 1973 was filed by KS. This
appeal was allowed
which
arose out of C.S. No.24C/79 and allowed RSA No.
2712/1987 which arose