Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd vs Rajni Devi & Ors on 22 April, 2008
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE ... Appeal (civil) 2892 of 2008
PETITIONER:
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd
RESPONDENT:
Rajni Devi & Ors
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 22/04/2008
BENCH:
S.B. Sinha
candidate Grand Total
Rajni Devi 8.90
Aarti Devi 8.00
Rano Devi 7.50
25. Against the name of Rajni Devi, it was mentioned that ... Devi and Rano Devi or he was not informed
.
that it was not Rano Devi who was next in merit but it was Aarti Devi
Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. vs Smt. Rajni Devi & Ors. on 6 January, 2012
Author: G.P. Mittal
Bench: G.P.Mittal
* IN THE HIGH ... Through: Ms. Manjusha Wadhwa Advocate
Ms. Angana Goswami Advocate
Versus
SMT. RAJNI DEVI & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Advocate with
Mr. Anil Singh
State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Smt Rajni Devi on 27 February, 2023
Author: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
Bench: Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia
1
IN THE HIGH COURT ... PETITIONER
(BY SHRI S.K. SHARMA - GOVT. ADVOCATE)
AND
1. SMT RAJNI DEVI W/O SHRI PURSHOTTAM
A G R A W A L VILLAGE
Chander Shekhar Gupta And Others vs Rajni Devi And Others on 5 May, 2018
Equivalent citations: AIRONLINE 2018 J AND K 530
HIGH COURT ... 2012
Date of decision: 05.05.2018
___________________________________________________________
Chander Shekhar Gupta and others vs. Rajni Devi and others
Coram:
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Janak Raj Kotwal, Judge
Rajni Devi vs State Of Punjab on 13 April, 2023
Author: Anoop Chitkara
Bench: Anoop Chitkara
Neutral Citation No:=2023:PHHC ... HARYANA
AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-14871-2023
Decided on: 13.04.2023
Rajni Devi ...Petitioner
Versus
State of Punjab ...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP
Rule 11 CPC
By this application, the defendant/ applicant seeks
Usha Devi Vs. Rajni Chaudhary
2
dismissal of the suit filed by the petitioner with ... support of his contentions.
Usha Devi Vs. Rajni Chaudhary
3
On the contrary, the ld. counsel for the non
applicant/plaintiff vehemently opposed the application
Rajni Devi Devi vs The State Of Bihar on 27 February, 2025
Author: Ashutosh Kumar
Bench: Partha Sarthy , Ashutosh Kumar
IN THE HIGH COURT
Kirpa Ram (PW1), LC Daya Devi (PW11) and Pushpa Devi
and thereafter proceeded towards the spot. LC Daya Devi (PW11)
did not depose anything about ... impressed upon Rajni Devi to produce Jeet Ram otherwise
she and Banti Devi would not be released. He also denied that Rajni
and Banti were
Rajni were recorded at the spot. Rajni was present on the spot
when the site plan was prepared. He never visited Rajni at her
house ... specifically deposed that he never visited Rajni at her
house.
28. That apart, admittedly it was only Rajni Devi who was
alleged to be accompanying
