Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Pradeep Ram vs The State Of Jharkhand on 1 July, 2019 Equivalent citations: AIR 2019

grapple with the said question of law, we would like to recount the bare minimum facts for answering the said question. 2 The petitioner

well, this Court in K. Saravanan Karuppasamy and Sudipta Lenka, (supra), recounted the above propositions underpinning the primacy of credibility and confidence in investigations

accounts of the same. That is because the perceptiveness varies and a recount of the same incident is usually at variance to a considerable extent

turned emotional and could not or did not want to recount or recall the entire incident, which she would have wanted to forget

failed to appreciate that the prosecutrix was a minor and her statement recounting the incident had been corroborated with the medical evidence which proves that

have not supported the prosecution case.It may be profitable to recount relevant parts of their evidence in précis. P.W. 2, Swapan Mandal, admitted

identify the signature in Ex.P.1(a), and failed to recount whatever written in Ex.P.1 and turned hostile. In his cross-examination ... identify the signature in Ex.P.1(b), and failed to recount written in it and turned hostile. In his cross-examination by Learned Public

withhold the possession of the property. In such facts and circumstances as recounted above, the culpability would have to be adjudicated based upon not spoken