Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 74 (0.50 seconds)

Tej Singh vs N C Rly on 1 June, 2018

passed an order dated 30.09.2005 (Annexure No. 2 of the OA) for redeployment of the applicant from commercial department to technical department and assigning ... lower post as compared to coach attendants. Being aggrieved by the redeployment order dated 30.09.2005 the applicant filed Original Application no. 858 of 2006 before
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

O P Sinha vs Union Of India on 24 March, 2026

Annexure-A-1) issuing Shakuntala Singh 3 seniority of only 15 redeployed TTE's en block in Lucknow Division instead of 50 redeployed TTEs ... interpolate the inter se seniority of the applicants en block of 50 redeployed TTEs as (34 TTEs earlier deployed) following statutory provisions contained in Note
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 2 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

D K Pathak vs Union Of India on 13 October, 2023

dated 13.08.2001, Divisional Personnel Officer, Northern Railway Lucknow vide letter dated 01.10.2001 redeployed the surplus staff as redeployed T.T.E. for line training ... order. All the applicants after successful completion of training were posted as redeployed T.T.E. at Prayag Station North Central Railway Allahabad. Applicant
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Pravesh Kumar Bhatnagar Aged About 43 ... vs Union Of India on 26 November, 2013

direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider the redeployment of the applicant on the post of Welfare Inspector within a stipulated ... deployment was issued on 21.10.2011 by the respondent No.2. Before redeploying the medically decategorized persons, respondent No.2 sought the approval from the respondent
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dineshwar Prasad Tiwari vs Divisional Railway Manager N C Rly on 22 December, 2021

positions of Coach Attendants were rendered surplus and these Coach Attendants were redeployed. In the aforesaid redeployment order, the applicants along with other similarly placed ... positions in the Railways. However, the applicants did not accept this redeployment scheme/proposal since the position of Coach Attendant where they were posted
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Ram Surat vs General Manager, N E Rly on 28 August, 2024

accordingly applicants were also declared surplus along with other staff. They were redeployed in Signal Workshop GKC., in accordance with Railway Board's letter ... noticed that the applicants fixation at the time of his redeployment in Signal Workshop, Gorakhpur Cantt. was wrongly fixed in contravention of MANISH KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
Central Administrative Tribunal - Allahabad Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next