which a set off is claimed.
Consequential orders of set off and refund are sought.
Facts
3. The Petitioner which is a partnership firm ... invoices of its vendor.
On 4 December 2010, the Petitioner claimed a refund of Rs.21.08
lakhs, resulting from the return filed. The Petitioner
United Projects vs The State Of Maharashtra on 12 July, 2022
Author: R.D. Dhanuka
Mahyco Monsanto Biotech Pvt Ltd vs The State Of Maharashtra And Ors on 12 July
Larsen And Tourbo Ltd vs The State Of Maharashtra Thru Thr Gp And ... on 12
recovered from the
petitioner on sale, the corresponding obligation would be to
refund the tax collected to M/s ASK Agencies for the very same
MVAT Act, inter alia, deals with set off and
refund. Section 48(5) stipulates as under:
"(5) For the removal of doubt ... hereby declared that, in no
case the amount of set-off or refund on any purchase of goods
shall exceed the amount
Secured Asset, failing which the auction purchasers requested the
Petitioner Bank to refund the amount deposited by them. On 25 th April,
Tikam page
Secured Asset, failing which the auction purchasers requested the
Petitioner Bank to refund the amount deposited by them. On 25 th April,
Tikam page
Secured Asset, failing which the auction purchasers requested the
Petitioner Bank to refund the amount deposited by them. On 25 th April,
Tikam page
