Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

parents that they realise he horror of parochialism and are repentant for having acted so foolishly. [252 C] 6. That after this realisation comes

Maru Ram Etc. Etc vs Union Of Lndia & Anr on 11 November, 1980 Equivalent

Union Of India vs Shri Gopal Chandra Misra And Ors on 15 February, 1978 Equivalent

convicted of any serious offence and shows poignant penitence or real repentence he may be dealt with as lightly as possible. This appears

K. Rajendran & Ors. Etc. Etc vs State Of Tamil Nadu & Ors on 15

Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. vs Gopal Chandra Misra And Ors. on 15 February

time of his arrest and that he wanted to confess out of repentance for what he had done he gave him three hours time ... that Sunil told him that he wanted to confess because he was repentant for what he had done and that he replied in the negative

accused who had committed offence under some emotional strain and, having been repentant, appeared at the Police Station to plead his guilt. If such would

there being an iota of evidence imagined that the accused might have repented for his act. though he did not plead guilty for fear