Narinder Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 7 October, 2015
reformative aspect is meant to enable the person concerned to relent and
repent for his action and make himself acceptable to the society as useful
Search Results Page
Search Results
91 - 100 of 201 (0.45 seconds)M. Periyasamy vs State By on 2 September, 2015
jail for 59 days. It is also submitted that the petitioner repents for his misdeeds. The trial Court imposed a punishment of one year
Manhar I.E.Munno Chanabhai Gamit vs State Of Gujarat & 2 on 8 October, 2015
solve the
disputes and misunderstanding between us simultaneously. Now I am
heartily repenting for the same I have no grievance against the
present petitioners
Palanisamy vs State Represented By on 14 October, 2015
thereby, the accident had occurred. It is submitted that the petitioner is repenting his misdeeds and is also willing to pay some compensation
C. Thirumalaisamy vs State By Inspector Of Police on 2 September, 2015
family. The counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner repents for his misdeeds and therefore he prayed for showing some leniency
M.Krishan vs The State Rep. By The on 7 September, 2015
having any previous case. It is submitted that the petitioner is repenting his misdeeds and is also willing to pay some compensation to the family
M.Munireddy vs The State on 7 September, 2015
losing his job, therefore, leniency may be shown, as he now repents for the offence.
3. Mr.V.Arul, learned Government Advocate appearing
Narayanasamy vs State By Inspector Of Police on 17 June, 2015
years old at the time of the incident and he is repenting for his actions. He is the sole breadwinner of the family and therefore ... only 27 years at the time of occurrence and he is repenting for his actions. Therefore, while confirming the conviction, sentence alone is reduced
Mani vs State By The on 21 September, 2015
learned counsel for the petitioner would further add that the petitioner is repenting for his deeds and that he is a senior citizen, aged ... consider reducing the sentence taking into consideration that the petitioner has repented for his deeds and that he is the only sole breadwinner
Ramu vs State Represented By on 29 September, 2015
take care of his children. It is submitted that the petitioner is repenting his misdeeds and is also willing to pay some compensation