order by the 1st Respondent on 14.07.2000 but he was issued reposting
order by order 13.11.2000 notifying his date of appointment ... attended the interview along with the
Applicant were issued with the reposting order on 18.10.2000 and their
3 OA No.310/01134/2019
date
with the said two
Orders/Reports. In view of the same, the prayer in
the PIL in regard to orders dated ... impugned order, in so far as they were adverse
to NSDL.
11. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that
the Orders/Reposts dated 4.12.2008 with
herein aggrieved by the said order of the Tribunal has filed the present application seeking to recall the order of the Tribunal.
3. Shri Habibullah ... Tribunal would be well within its jurisdiction in setting aside that order and reposting the appeals for disposal on merits in terms of Rule
time
bound reference for investigation in a matter as per the order off
Hon'ble Supreme Court and hence he
e was asked ... submitted his representation on
21.02.1995.
10.03.1995 requesting to cancel his transfer order and
reposting him to post at Bhuj Unit. This representation of the
applicant
assessee's said
appeal was in relation to rejection of rectification order passed by
3
MA.No. 316/MUM/2021
M/s. Eurofinance Training ... Bench of the ITAT to
recall the impugned order and repost the same for fresh hearing.
7. Under the said premises, applicant most humbly prays
order for A.Y.
2013-14 but the facts mentioned in order to relevant year 2009-10.
3. On perusal of the said order ... Bench of the ITAT to recall the impugned order and repost the same for fresh
hearing.
5. Under the said premises, applicant most humbly prays
Bengaluru Urban Divisi
Division.
5 OA No.444/2022
The impugned order has been issued at the behest of 4th Respondent
who has already
already ... charge taking
certificate dated 05.11.20222, in the absence of reposting/movement
order by the Head of the Forest Force, the applic
applicant cannot assume
hearing and reserving the orders, as one of the Members who heard the appeals happened to retire, the case was reposted for hearing and another
assessee, the Tribunal vide its Order
in ITA No.232/CTK/2010 dated 27.06.2014, set aside the order of CIT and
restored the issue ... case was
reposted to 10.08.2016, however, the assessee requested for
adjournment of hearing vide letter received on 17.08.2016.
The Tribunal vide order
bears no reference to an order under
section 119(2)(b) of the Act. The same is an administrative order, against which,
where aggrieved, recourse ... only at the time of dictating
the order after being heard on 02/2/2020, necessitating reposting the appeal for
hearing again
