Company. The Company appointed the petitioner as Visiting Medical Officer on monthly retainership basis in the year 1986 initially for a period of 12 months ... Rules, the Company appointed a temporary Visiting Medical Officer on retainership. The petitioner, though appointed as Visiting Medical officer, is a workman as defined under
Rules, the Company appointed a temporary Visiting Medical Officer on retainership. The petitioner, though appointed as Visiting Medical Officer, is a workman as defined under ... services of the petitioner to appoint another Visiting Medical Officer on retainership. Reliance is placed on the following decisions.
1. T.I. Cycles Of India
ILLEGAL AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE
2
RESPONDENT TO PAY THE PETITIONER THE
RETAINERSHIP AMOUNT AS FIXED BY GOVERNMENT TO
HIM AS SPECIAL ... period was extended from time to time and
ultimately on 17.02.2009. Retainership amount for the
period upto 27.01.2010 having not been paid, after
submitting
relieves her of
15
her position by giving one month's retainership fee. The same is
done in exercise of power conferred by Rule ... giving one month's notice
or giving one month's retainership fee in lieu of such notice. For
invoking Rule
email on 24.05.2017 stating that the
respondents would not make payment for retainership
fee of the previous month as they had not received the
payment ... that only after
the payments were realized that they would be paying
retainership and the commission amount. Therefore,
the petitioner issued legal notice dated
Indian Council For Enviro-Legal Action ... vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 29
Judicial Department Multi-Purpose ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 April, 2025
Author: Suraj
accused
No.1 and the 2nd respondent-complainant which arose out of
retainership agreement dated 14-07-2016 and a memorandum of
understanding dated
Raveendra/accused No.3. The complainant/Company entered
into a Retainership Agreement with M/s Beehive Advisors, owing
to the special expertise i.e., consultancy
doctor by profession who had
entered the service of respondent on a retainership
basis in terms of the contract dated 12.06.2019
which was in force
