petitioner (respondent before the Ld. Arbitrator) was
liable to pay fixed retainership of Rs. 65,00,000/- for the period
16.05.2008 to August ... perform its obligations and merely
mentioning of the word "retainership" does not mean that it
is/was entitled to retainership amount, irrespective
client on all matters relating to Provident Fund, plaintiff shall
charge a retainership fee of Rs.25,000/- per month. The financial
justification submitted ... been paid his dues of
Rs.90,000/- qua the retainership fee of Rs.15,000/- per month. The
transportation (taxi) charges of Rs.6801
accident. Further, it failed to consider the
memorandum of understanding for retainership (Exhibit-21) where the
victim was given retainership ... claimant, Mr. Paul, learned advocate for appellant-insurance company
submitted that the retainership has been terminated by the concerned
company vide letter dated
accident. Further, it failed to consider the
memorandum of understanding for retainership (Exhibit-21) where the
victim was given retainership ... claimant, Mr. Paul, learned advocate for appellant-insurance company
submitted that the retainership has been terminated by the concerned
company vide letter dated
workmen viz. Dineshbhai Babubhai Acharya and
Bharatbhai Ravishankar Jani were engaged on retainership basis as
per the agreement entered into between the petitioner company ... said workmen. As per the retainership conditions, it was
open for the said workmen to complete the work as per their own
convenience and they
plaintiff had informed the defendant
of his professional fees including the retainership fees
that would be charged by the plaintiff. It was specifically
informed ... defendant that the plaintiff would charge
retainership fees of Rs. 15,00,000/- which included the
fees only for representing the defendant before
defendant, she
offered plaintiff to join her on a monthly retainership of Rs. 27,000/- at
her office viz. 'SMILES FOR MILES ... defendant in January
2019. During the initial period, defendant would give her retainership
amount well in time. Thereafter, on several occasions, defendant used
the credit
parties.
2. The disputes between the parties have arisen out of a Retainership
agreement dated 11.07.2019, executed between the parties, wherein the
respondent ... monthly retainership fee to the petitioner against
the services rendered.
3. Admittedly, the Retainership agreement contains an arbitration clause
in the following terms
JUDICIAL) MS. PRIYA
MAHENDRA, (DHJS)
ORDER
% 04.12.2023
ARB.P. 92/2023
The Retainership Agreement dated 11.07.2019 was
ordered to be impounded as it was found ... Court dated 19.10.2023, an Authenticated Copy of
Original Retainership Agreement dated 11.07.2019 and
Certificate as provided in Section 38(1) of the Indian
Stamp
Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax ... vs M/S Infosys Limited , Bangalore on 9 January, 2023
