Tribunal. In case the sitting Chairperson seeks re-
appointment, a retired Supreme Court Judge or retired Chief
Justice of a High Court nominated ... notified by the Central
Government, this additional member must always be a retired
Supreme Court Judge or retired Chief Justice of a High Court
first Office Order dated 13 September
2019, the petitioner was compulsorily retired from service under FR
56(j)3 read with Rule ... public interest so to do, have
the absolute right to retire any Government servant by giving him notice of not less than three months
AFFAIRS
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
7. SMT. A.K. NAVEEN KUMARI
RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
RESIDING AT K. NARENDRA BABU
MARUTHI ... MAIN
V.V. MOHALLA, MYSURU-570 002
-
3
8. SRI. C. RAJASEKHARA
RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT No.539, 5TH CROSS
AFFAIRS
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
7. SMT. A.K. NAVEEN KUMARI
RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
RESIDING AT K. NARENDRA BABU
MARUTHI ... MAIN
V.V. MOHALLA, MYSURU-570 002
-
3
8. SRI. C. RAJASEKHARA
RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT No.539, 5TH CROSS
AFFAIRS
VIDHANA SOUDHA
BENGALURU-560 001
7. SMT. A.K. NAVEEN KUMARI
RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
RESIDING AT K. NARENDRA BABU
MARUTHI ... MAIN
V.V. MOHALLA, MYSURU-570 002
-
3
8. SRI. C. RAJASEKHARA
RETIRED DISTRICT JUDGE
AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS
RESIDING AT No.539, 5TH CROSS
benefit of the pension scheme, which is made applicable to the employees
retiring after 01.04.1994, claiming that it should be also made applicable ... employees, who retired prior to 01.04.1994. In all the writ petitions the
facts as well as the prayers made by the petitioners are totally distinct
benefit of the pension scheme, which is made applicable to the employees
retiring after 01.04.1994, claiming that it should be also made applicable ... employees, who retired prior to 01.04.1994. In all the writ petitions the
facts as well as the prayers made by the petitioners are totally distinct
benefit of the pension scheme, which is made applicable to the employees
retiring after 01.04.1994, claiming that it should be also made applicable ... employees, who retired prior to 01.04.1994. In all the writ petitions the
facts as well as the prayers made by the petitioners are totally distinct
benefit of the pension scheme, which is made applicable to the employees
retiring after 01.04.1994, claiming that it should be also made applicable ... employees, who retired prior to 01.04.1994. In all the writ petitions the
facts as well as the prayers made by the petitioners are totally distinct
nature of Mandamus directing and
commanding the Respondents to pay the
Retiral benefits to the petitioner including
Full pension on the basis of last ... date of retirement, difference of U.G.C.
pay and other admissible retiral benefits
with adequate amount of interest 18% per
annum with suitable amount
