petitioners were brought to the Court in handcuffed position, which is
against the human rights.
9. Mr. Hariharan further submitted that the learned Trial Court
Manjit Singh vs State on 10 September, 2014
Author: J.R. Midha
Bench: J.R
Constitutional right by the
protestors and order Respondent No.1 remove the Delhi Police
Commissioner for his failure in protecting constitutionally
guaranteed rights of protestors ... their failure in containing crimes against
women in Delhi.
l. Issue an order directing the FIR against the eight accused
persons in the instant case
Constitutional right by the
protestors and order Respondent No.1 remove the Delhi Police
Commissioner for his failure in protecting constitutionally
guaranteed rights of protestors ... their failure in containing crimes against
women in Delhi.
l. Issue an order directing the FIR against the eight accused
persons in the instant case
only this it deprived the petitioner of the right of an effective representation against it.
5. Mr.Bagai next submitted that there was no question ... said option.
6. Petitioner further submits that he was denied the right of an effective representation before the Advisory Board. He submits that
Surender @ Dheeraj vs State on 27 February, 2018
Author: S. Muralidhar
Bench: S.Muralidhar , I
Harassment of HIV/AIDS Outreach Workers in
India' published by Human Rights Watch, the police during
investigation of a complaint under Section ... reported crime under Section 377 IPC, a
prosecution was launched against the said health care
workers on charges that included Section 292 IPC treating
Satish Kumar Goel vs State And Others on 4 February, 2000
Equivalent citations: 2000IIAD(DELHI
Ms. Nidhi Kaushik vs Union Of India & Ors. on 26 May, 2014
Author: J
New Delhi Municipal Council vs M/S Prominent Hotels Limited on 11 September, 2015
Author