Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

Robkar Adalat vs Aseem Kumar Sawhney And Anr. on 30 March, 2001 Equivalent citations: 2002CRILJ2382 ORDER Tejinder Singh Doabia, J. 1. "Pen is mighter

Robkar vs Tahir Jandial on 17 February, 2022 Author: Sanjay Dhar Bench: Sanjay Dhar Sr. No. 17 HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH ... CRMC No. 411/2017 IA No. 01.2017 CrlM No. 465/2021 ROBKAR ..... Petitioner/Appellant(s) Ranjeeta Kour Through: Mr. Rahul Pant, Sr. Advocate with

Robkar vs Abdul Gani Bhat on 27 October, 2021 Bench: Chief Justice , Vinod Chatterji Koul S. No. 25 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT ... JAMMU AND KASHMIR & LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CJ Court Case: Robkar no. 1/2019 Robkar ....petitioner(s) Through: None. v/s Abdul Gani Bhat ...respondent

Munsiff (1st Class Magistrate), Srinagar, had passed the order in a Robkar which was stated to be defamatory in nature, therefore, the complainant had filed ... security was also ordered to be confiscated. Moreover, a separate Robkar was issued against the accused and his surety. However, it is stated, that despite

Magistrate 1st Class, HARDOI" 2. On 4-3-1965 a Robkar was issued from the Court of the said Magistrate to P. S. Baghauli ... report of the police on the back of this Robkar dated 5-3-1965 shows that intimation of this order by the Magistrate was given

Suomoto Proceedings In Flesh Trade vs State And Ors. on 8 October, 2007 Equivalent citations

taken the accused in custody and he had sent the ''Robkar Haziri' of the accused Puneet to Police Station Asmoli, which

supplementary reports were received, which were copied in the case diary. The robkar of surrender of the accused Rishi was received. The statement

previous litigation between the parties. In view of the same, robkar be issued for calling the records pertaining to case bearing CT No.450/2022

former and ultimately after hearing him passed appropriate order in the robkar against him. The petitioner could not have been in law compelled ... incarceration to deposit the amount on the bail bond in the robkar against the surety, nor could he be forced to deposit any amount