Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 86 (0.44 seconds)

Mr.Sunil Kumar Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 9 February, 2011

officer concerned, the same mandir structure has been demolished by AE which consist of one room, roof, and boundary wall. 3. Copy of the order ... encroachment at the above mentioned site. The occupier re-encroached/constructed pucca structures on the above mentioned site. Hence the encroachment removal action was taken
Central Information Commission Cites 7 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Madan Lal Grover Q vs Delhi Police on 14 December, 2017

appellant's locality were involved in raising unauthorised, illegal structures on their common roof in gross violation of the municipal laws/byelaws ... Police, no action was taken against them and instead such dangerous structures were being openly and rampantly sold. Instead of any action against these perpetrators
Central Information Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Tgk Mahadev vs Indian Army on 25 June, 2021

ground floor owner and the ground floor owner created a structure with a sloping roof due to which the complainant cannot create any extension over ... reason of the complainant being aggrieved and filing representations to demolish the structure, moreso after having failed to get a favourable judgment from the Court
Central Information Commission Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - V N Sarna - Full Document

Mr.Sunil Kumar Sharma vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 11 January, 2011

officer concerned, the same mandir structure has been demolished by AE which consist of one room, roof, and boundary wall. 3. Copy of the order ... encroachment at the above mentioned site. The occupier re-encroached/constructed pucca structures on the above mentioned site. Hence the encroachment removal action was taken
Central Information Commission Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next