Roop Chand Chaudhari vs Smt. Ranjit Kumari on 19 April, 1990
Equivalent citations: AIR1991P&H212, AIR 1991 PUNJAB AND HARYANA ... this Court. Our answer is that amendment cannot be allowed.
2. Roop Chand Chaudhary on 25-1-1988 agreed to sell his house
Chaudhary Roop Chand, an Advocate, who was practicing in the Punjab
and Haryana High Court. He had three sons and three daughters ... defendant no.2 (Suresh Chaudhary) has set up a Will (testamentary
document) dated 21.02.1989 executed by late Chaudhary Roop Chand
bequeathing his agricultural land equally
other judgment pressed into service in the hearing is Roop Chand Chaudhari Vs. Ranjit Kumari reported ... performance can alternatively sue for damages, but converse is not true. Roop Chand Chaudhari case was rendered by a Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana
1382/2009
1. Smt. Santosh Devi W/o Late Shri Roop Chand
Chaudhary, Aged About 48 Years, R/o Ganpati Bihar,
Teejara Road, Near Shanti ... Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar.
2. Mahipal S/o Late Shri Roop Chand Chaudhary, R/o
Ganpati Bihar, Teejara Road, Near Shanti Public School,
Alwar
Private) Ltd., and
another ) and AIR 1991 Punjab and Haryana 212 ( Roop Chand Chaudhari Vs. Smt.
Ranjit Kumari ). It is also submitted that in order ... Private) Ltd., and another] and AIR 1991 Punjab and Haryana
212 ( Roop Chand Chaudhari Vs. Smt. Ranjit Kumari ) to submit that when a plea
Bali, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. Roop
Chand Chaudhary, has argued that discharge by the police by not filing
the challan
Mangal Misir v. Mathura Dubein (1916) ILR. 38 All 1 and Poonam Chand v. Moti Lal AIR 1955 Raj 179.
10. For the reasons recorded ... succeed in his suit without proving his title to the property. Chaudhary Roop Chand has argued that a plaintiff cannot succeed on the weakness
Sridharan vs. M.F.Simon , (2005) 2 MLJ 81
3. Roop Chand Chaudhari vs. Ranjit Kumar , AIR 1991 Punjab and Haryana 212
4. Sathyan ... Division Bench of Punjab and Haryana High Court in Roop Chand Chaudhari vs. Ranjit Kumar , AIR 1991 Punjab and Haryana 212, has held that when
Housing and Construction (P .) Ltd. , Ayissabi v. Gopala Konar and Roop Chand Chaudhari v. Ranjit Kumari . On the other hand, learned Counsel for the plaintiff ... include the relief of specific performance earlier abandoned by him. In Roop Chand Chaudhari v. Ranjit Kumari , it was held that once a suit
MANU/PH/0049/1991 [Roop Chand Chaudhari v. Smt Ranjit Kumari ] wherein the learned judges have followed the decisions of the Apex Court and reached
