make to those rules were described as hereunder:
1. "To Sub-rule (3) of Rule 6, the following proviso shall be added, namely ... Rule 6 in the form of Sub-rule (5). This sub-rule which was introduced into Rule 6 without its inclusion having been preceded
licences. Rule 3 of the Rules was amended to introduce Sub-
rule (2-A) and (9-A). Rule 5 of the Rules was amended ... proviso to sub-rule (3) of Rule 5A. Rule
12 of the Rules was also amended by the introduction of a proviso
to exclude
Services General Recruitment Rules and the Mysore Public Service Commission (Functions) Rules. According to Rule 3 of the General Recruitment Rules, the first step ... referred to the Tribunal. But, because the Andhra Rule contained two sub-rules and the proviso occurred in the second sub-rule, the appellant argued
under Rule 18 of 1969 Rules, but amended Rule No. 18, and by virtue of provisions of Rule 18 ratified the belated acceptance of 1 month ... provisions of Sub-rule (2) of unamended Rule 18 of 1969 Rules. Sub-rule (2) says:
"The disposal under Sub-rule (1) shall
passed. But same cannot be said
in respect of the proviso to Rule 3 of Order 39. The
Parliament has prescribed a particular procedure ... Rule 3 will be a surplusage for all
practical purposes. Proviso to Rule 3 of Order 39 of
the Code, attracts the principle, that
that fall for Consideration in this Petition are:-
(1) Whether the proviso to Rule 3 of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (Salaries and Allowances and conditions ... mensem. However, there was no change in the Proviso.
Still later, the Proviso to the Rule was substituted under GSR 1049 (E) dated
Order VI
Rule 17 of the Code. Prior to the amendment in 2002, the
Order VI Rule 17 had no restrictive proviso.
13. Order ... interpreting the
proviso when the proviso has a limited role to play
considering the object behind the proviso and the purpose
of the main provision
that the
very provisions namely proviso to Rule 13(5) and Rule
13-A(3) of the Rules which are the subject matter of
controversy ... struck down the proviso to Rule 13(5) as well as
Rule 13-A (3) when it considered the Rules concerning
reservation of Offices
defendant has to seek enlargement of time in terms of the proviso under Rule 1 of Order VIII which proviso itself restricts the power ... Court trying the suit even beyond the period stipulated under the proviso to Rule 1 of Order VIII which now runs as under:
"Order
aggregate of what is mentioned in the said Rule.
Sub-Rule (2) of Rule 3 deals with the determination of
taxable turnover. The taxable turnover ... Rule 3(2)(c) and Rule 31 of the Rules. In
that context, it was held that Rule 3(2)(c) of the Rules
pertains
