earlier decisions in Ram Nagina Rai v. Dt. Magistrate , In re S. V. Ghate and Mohan Kumaramangalam ... held by the court that the order was illegal, In re S. V. Ghate , the Commissioner of Police, Bombay, passed an order of detention
S. 3 and the execution of the same under S. 4 can only be in respect of a person residing within its territory. Though S ... earlier decisions in Ram Nagina Rai v. Dt. Magistrate, , In re S.V. Ghate and Mohan Kumaramangalam
proper one to apply, Vishnu Bhikaji Phadke v. Achul Jagannath Ghate (1891) I.L.R. 15 Bom. 438, Shankar Sarup v Mejo ... money received for the plaintiff's use, The decision in Vishnu Bhikaji Phadke v. Achut Jagannath Ghate
apply, the cases of Vishnu Bhikaji Phadki v. Achut Jagannath Ghate (1890) I.L.R. 15 B. 438. Shankar Sarup v. Mejomal ... money received for the plaintiff's use. The decision in Vishnu Bhikaii v. Achut Jagannath Ghate
conduct of the plaintiff and his family, coupled with the defendant's changed situation which has resulted.
4. This case was cited ... without a serious effect, for good or ill, on the boy's welfare. In India the ties of family life are far stricter
found that the suit property is the absolute property of S.Purushothaman, the father of the parties and when it is found that both ... plaintiff and the defendant are the legal representatives of the deceased S.Purushothaman, it could be seen that as claimed by the plaintiff
Lift Ghate, Ennore, Chennai 600 057.
4.The Inspector of Police,
E-5, Ennore Police Station,
1st Floor, Tsunami Quarters Opposite,
Lift Ghate, Ennore, Chennai ... directing the 4th respondent to produce the body of
the petitioner's wife viz., E.Ranjeetha, aged about 29 years, before this
Court
Police,
K.Pudhur, Madurai.
2.The Inspector of Police,
Madurai South Ghate Police Station,
Madurai District.
3.Bakkiyalakshmi
4.Durairajan
5.D.Suryavel ... Respondents
Prayer ... respondents to conduct a proper and fair enquiry on the
petitioner's representations dated 31.12.2024 and 25.10.2025 and to take
appropriate legal action against
S.Shankar vs The Union Of India on 27 June, 2019
Author: M.S.Ramesh
Bench: M.S. Ramesh
1
IN THE HIGH COURT ... HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
W.P.No.24739 of 2004
S.Shankar, Managing Partner,
M/s.Precision Controls,
Flat No.20, Sidco Industrial
reported at 11 B. H. C. R, 190, Sadashiv Moreshvar Ghate v. Hari Moreshvar Ghate, and I. L. R, 11. B, 381, Ravji Vinayakrav Jaggannath ... unable to assent to the argument of the appellant's pleader that estpoppel only refers to cases of contract.
2. This second appeal fails
