conclusion that he has deliberately made a false statement : In re. S. Ramalingam, Air, 1965 Mad. 100. That has not been done. Instead, the prosecution ... second return was filed by the assessed in response to notice u/s 148 . Lord Denning in Selvarajan v. Race Relations Board
Supreme Court in East and
West Steamship Co., Georgetown, Madra Vs S.K. Ramalingam
Chettiar [1960] 3 SCR 820, the Court held that Clause ... paragraph-18 of the East and West Steamship
Co. V/s.S K Ramalingam Chettiar 's case (supra) the Supreme
Court took note that
Nahar Spinning Mills Ltd. vs Vijay Hosiery Co. Ltd. And Ors. on 4 January, 2006
Chandra Ghose Vs. Provabati Ghose , and AIR 1957 Andh Pra 960, S. Ramalingam Pilla Vs. G.R. Jagadammal).
5. Recently in the case
s. A. M. Qubic P. Ltd. was to manufacture corrugated boxes and the main supply was to M/s. Food Specialities Ltd. Shri A. Ramalingam ... established that the other shareholder(s) of M/s. A. M. Qubic P. Ltd. were benami of Shri A. Ramalingam. The company has been duly
Supreme Court in East and West Steamship Co. V/s.S K Ramalingam Chettiar in which it is held by the Supreme Court ... paragraph-18 of the East and West Steamship Co. V/s.S K Ramalingam Chettiar's case (supra) the Supreme Court took note that
wall built by R-2 sometime in November, 2018.
14.The petitioner‟s Concession Agreement with DMRC dated
25.07.2003 was never amended. In any case ... Senior Advocate for the petitioner relies upon the dicta
in S.Kumar versus S.Ramalingam (2020) 16 SCC 553, which
inter alia reads as under
these Under
Secretary's select list. Following table would depict the
position:
S. Name CSL Ministry/Deptt.
No. (S/Shri/Ms No.
1. Ignatius ... S.No.193
Empowerment
2. Chuni Lal 3476 Chemicals & SL 1993
Kaul Petrochemicals S.No.32
3. M. 3744 ISC SL 1993
Ramalingam S
word "Lost" ?
10. According to the Webster's Third New International Dictionary, the work "Loss" means. The act or fact ... Supreme Court in East & West Steamship Co. v. S.K. Ramalingam Chettiar , , construing the provisions of Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925, Schedule
Supreme in East and West Steamship Co., Georgetown, Madras Vs. S.K. Ramalingam Chettiar and sought to contend that a distinction was made
