Further, we also hold that the decision in V.T. Ramalingam's case [1993] 201 ITR 839 (Mad), was based on the facts ... occupation of the family members. In V.T. Ramalingam's case [1993] 201 ITR 839 (Mad), it
was also not found that some portion
case.
During the pendency of the writ petition, Sri S.Ramalingam, Commandant Staff Officer to DIGP, CRPF,
2. Bangalore was impleaded as respondent ... controversy. They are: the recruitment board headed by Sri S.Ramalingam, Commandant Staff Officer to DIGP, Bangalore as per ADIGP, GS, CRPF, Hyderabad office order
Further, we also hold that the decision in CWT v. T. Ramalingam's case (supra), was based on the facts of the case ... occupation of the family members. In CWT v. T. Ramalingam's, it was also not found that some portion referable to the share owned
case.
2. During the pendency of the writ petition, Sri S. Ramalingam, Commandant Staff Officer to DIGP, CRPF, Bangalore was impleaded as respondent ... controversy. They are : the Recruitment Board headed by Sri S. Ramalingam, Commandant Staff Officer to DIGP, Bangalore as per ADIGP, GS, CRPF, Hyderabad Officer Order
date-fixed writ petitions."
19. The learned single Judge (Justice S. Ramalingam, as he then was) took up both the writ petitions, heard
Code. The Madras High Court in R.LAKSHMIPATHI Vs. S.RAMALINGAM (15) held, when a private complaint was taken on file by the Judicial Magistrate
S.No. 83 of 1982 against Tangam alias Palanichami Chettiar, Ramalingam and L.S.Mariappan, the appellant herein who were arrayed as defendants ... S.Rathinam alias Kuppamuttu. P2, S.Sellam alias Palanichami Chettiar. P3, S.Pechimuttu. P5, S.Shanmugam. P6. L.Palanichamy - P7 against the second defendant Ramalingam
learned Judge has also referred to another order passed by S. Ramalingam, J., in
W.P.Nos.4527 and 7642 etc., of 1984 dated ... under the guise of fixing the final cost. The judgment of S.Ramalingam, J., was affirmed by the Division Bench of this Court
mentioned in the schedule to the Judge's summons.
12. Thiru S. Ramalingam, M.S.W., B.L., Advocate, Chamber No. 22-B, High
decision in East and West Steamship Co. George Town Madras Vs. S.K. Ramalingam Chettiar , . On the other hand while controverting the said submission ... Limitation Act, 1963 . Reliance was placed on the decision in M/s.Vii Sales Corporation Vs. Lufthansa German Airlines, ILR (1981) II Delhi 749.
Said
