S.Lakshmi Priya Exports (India) Pvt. ... vs M/S.Ramalingam Mills Ltd., And ... on 15 February, 2016
Author: A.Ramalingeswara Rao
Bench: A.Ramalingeswara ... suits, where the
defendants were common.
O.S.No.23 of 2007 was filed by M/s.Ramalingam Mills
Ltd., seeking recovery of money against
Canara Bank And Ors. vs S. Ramalingam on 10 June, 2003
Equivalent citations: 2003(5)ALD26
Author: B. Sudershan Reddy
Bench: B. Sudershan Reddy
JUDGMENT ... permanently absorbed in the quota of ex-serviceman in the respondent's Bank with effect from 26-6-1979 and as such
case.
During the pendency of the writ petition, Sri S.Ramalingam, Commandant Staff Officer to DIGP, CRPF,
2. Bangalore was impleaded as respondent ... controversy. They are: the recruitment board headed by Sri S.Ramalingam, Commandant Staff Officer to DIGP, Bangalore as per ADIGP, GS, CRPF, Hyderabad office order
case.
2. During the pendency of the writ petition, Sri S. Ramalingam, Commandant Staff Officer to DIGP, CRPF, Bangalore was impleaded as respondent ... controversy. They are : the Recruitment Board headed by Sri S. Ramalingam, Commandant Staff Officer to DIGP, Bangalore as per ADIGP, GS, CRPF, Hyderabad Officer Order
Code. The Madras High Court in R.LAKSHMIPATHI Vs. S.RAMALINGAM (15) held, when a private complaint was taken on file by the Judicial Magistrate
decision of this Court in N. Pola Reddy v. S. Ramalingam, (1988) 2 Arbitration Law Reporter 421, a learned Single Judge of this Court while
Ramalingam v. Director , Daily Thanthi and A.B.K. Prasad v. Union of India .
14. In the Khair-ud-Din's case (supra), judgment ... Division Bench of the Madras High Court in the O. Ramalingam 's case (supra), judgment held thus:
For escaping liability in damages regarding such
S. Ramulu punishable under Section 307 r/w 149 IPC ;
iv) Against A1 and A8 for committing murder of S. Ramalingam punishable under Section ... under constructive liability for committing the murder of S. Ramalingam punishable under Section 302 r/w 149 IPC ;
vi) Against A4 and A7 for voluntarily
Dwarka Prasad v. Krishna Murty, AIR 1939 Pat. 254. In Ramalingam's case (1 supra) it was not the question before the Court
s suit. A further contention is urged by Sri Ayyanna Pantulu, counsel for Sri. M. S. Rajalingam, that, since Sri. M. S. Rajalingam was appointed ... S. No. 71/1969 was instituted subsequent to the coming into force of these Rules, Sri M. S. Ramalingam filed his appearance on behalf
