leading case. We will refer to
the said case as the SAIL Case. In the said case
originally, the appellant company which is
manufacturer ... into effect with retrospective effect. It is based
on the same that SAIL deposited Rs.142 crores by way
of excise duty. This was done
directing the
1
contract labourers who were in the employment of SAIL from
1993 till 1996(17th March, 1993 to April 1996) to be reinstated ... appellant Steel Authority of India
Limited (hereinafter being referred to as “SAIL”) is a Government
of India undertaking and is a State within the meaning
Ntpc- Sail Power Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi vs Dcit, New Delhi on 4 October, 2019
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL
(DELHI BENCH ... ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
ITA No:- 2146/Del/2017
(Assessment Year: 2013-14)
NTPC-SAIL Power Co. Pvt. Dy. Commissioner of Income
Ltd., 4 th Floor, NBCC
captive mine of the Steel Authority of
India(hereinafter called as “SAIL”) in Kuteshwar Limestone
Mines(Barhi), Gairtalai, Distt. Jabalpur.
2. The indisputed facts which ... employees) of Kuteshwar
limestone mines who had worked in the establishment of SAIL
after issuance of the prohibition notification dated 17th March,
1993 filed their
Zogikharian, 18-Arizal, 19-Qamroo, 20-Rawalpora-Beerwah ; and PC 35- Sail in Tehsil Berwah; and PCs 13-Waterhail, 14-Jawalapora, 15-Sondipora, 16-Dalipora
until the vessel
jacked up at WO-16 location, offshore India, after sailing away from
consortium's yard. It is contended that even assuming ... extension. It was impossible for the
petitioner to achieve that it could sail before 30 November 2018 by
which the contract was required
Singh vs Steel Authority Of India Ltd. (Sail) on 17 May, 2019
के न्द्रीय सूचना आयोग
Central Information Commission
बाबा गंगनाथ मागग, मुननरका
Baba Gangnath ... नई दिल्ली, New Delhi - 110067
नितीय अपील संख्या / Second Appeal No. CIC/SAIL1/C/2017/165386
Jh vkj0 Mh0 flag ....अपीलकताग/Appellant
VERSUS
बनाम
until the vessel
jacked up at WO-16 location, offshore India, after sailing away from
consortium's yard. It is contended that even assuming ... extension. It was impossible for the
petitioner to achieve that it could sail before 30 November 2018 by
which the contract was required
Steel Authority of India Ltd.
(hereinafter referred to as "SAIL") on provisional basis.
b. On 27th December, 2007, the petitioner was allotted ... order dated 26th April, 2018. The order directed M/s SAIL to
make payment of gratuity only after vacation of quarter allotted to
the petitioner
called in question by Steel Authority of India Limited
(hereafter 'SAIL') before this Court in WP 20732(W) of 2009 by invoking ... writ
jurisdiction. Incidentally, the company which was initially a subsidiary of SAIL
has since been taken over by SAIL
