euch ieence.
Te aS se
Te Lis
for pay ment, of licence fee for several
bemeds of ice iced ietnione d thene ... pail tor the period jor which the licence had
lapsed. Sil, on the iueustence of the respondents to pay
the period
clients had valid grounds to assume that the licence which they possessed would be a valid licence for the present importation and among other aspects ... commodity is concerned, that it requires a specific licence which by implication would indicate that the SIL will not cover it. With regard
District. The Appellate Court, 3it;7t_2ittt§,
t..e apt'-,.....sIl -.e. that the t
petitioner is before this -- V'
I «L2 trntr ... infurtned that the petitioner's nenewai
storage licence was pending and that the sandal-wood oil in
TV question was a quantity that
Commissioner Of Customs vs Sri Vikram Jain S/O Sri Bheemraj Jain on 30 September
Master B R Ritesh vs State Of Karnataka on 22 June, 2010
Author: Anand Byrareddy
M/S Jindal Vijayanagar Steels Ltd vs M/S Mspl Ltd & Others on 5
Gadigi Mineral Mining Co vs State Of Karnataka Commerce & Industry on 28 August, 2009
M/S Chalet Hotels Limited vs M/S Hindustan Aeronautics Limited on 29 May, 2020
Sri Jayanthilal Chandulal Kothari vs Sri C K Radesh on 16 June, 2009
Equivalent citations
Sri Rakesh Tandon vs State Rep By on 31 May, 2012
Author: C.R.Kumaraswamy
