High Court of Punjab and Harayana in Kashmirilal v. Dy. Commissioner Sonepat and Ors. , In my view, there is no force in the aforesaid contention ... immediate action. The giving of a show cause notice to the person sonepat to be suspended before exercising the power of suspension would result
impose levy or collect tax. In that case the industrial area of Sonepat where the appellant factory was situated was included in the municipal limits ... Sonepat by issuance of notification under Section 5(1) of the Act. There was a notification dated 3-11-42 issued under Section
Supreme Court in the matter of Sonepat Coop.
Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Ajit Singh , (2005) 3 SCC 232 has held as
under :-
(Downloaded
About 27 Years, R/o
House No. 142 Sector 7 Gohana District Sonepat Haryana
151. Dr. Samiksha Meena D/o Shri Ghan Shyam Meena, Aged
Jan Mohd. vs The State Of Rajasthan And Ors. on 12 May, 1992
Equivalent citations
Court of Punjab and Haryana in Kashmiri Lal v. The Deputy Commr., Sonepat (AIR 1980 Punj & Har 209) (supra) in the context ... High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Kashmirilal v. The Deputy Commr, Sonepat, AIR 1980 Punj & Har 209 and the decision of the Division
Kala has placed reliance on Baru Ram v. Labour Officer, Sonepat, 1985 ACJ 147(P&H), which in turn takes support from Himmatlal Harilal
Jagmohan , AIR 1981 SC 136, Kashmiri Lal v. The Deputy Commissioner, Sonepat , AIR 1980 Punj & Har 200 (FB) and Namdeo Ragho Arote v. State
appellant on an account maintained by him in the Indian Bank, Sonepat branch. That being so, there is little doubt that the very first ingredient
About 27 Years, R/o
House No. 142 Sector 7 Gohana District Sonepat Haryana
151. Dr. Samiksha Meena D/o Shri Ghan Shyam Meena, Aged
