Taraprasanna Ganguly And Ors. vs Naresh Chandra Chakrabarty And Ors. on 25 January, 1933
circumstance that the prayer "Kha" of the plaint was struck off by an order dated 19th January 1931. The prayer
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 596 (0.77 seconds)Idol Sri Sri Gokul Nath Jiu vs New Birbhum Coal Co., Ltd. on 23 March, 1923
Court Fees Act. I thought it necessary to look into the plaint in order to enable me to decide it, and the learned Vakil ... Plaintiff has not prayed for any consequential relief in his plaint. It struck me on reading the plaint that on the statement of facts
Steel Authority Of India Ltd. vs Transworld Marine Ltd. And Anr. on 4 November, 1981
name of the defendant No. 2 be struck out from the plaint.
6. The case of the defendant No. 2 is that the plaint filed ... above, the
defendant No. 2 succeeds in its application. The plaint however cannot be struck out in its entirety. Following the decision of the Division
Orissa Oil Industries Ltd. vs Bihar State Forest Development ... on 12 April, 1979
injunction as contained in prayers (a), (b) and (c) of the plaint be struck out.
(e) An injunction do issue restraining the plaintiff from proceeding ... made under Clause 14 that part of the plaint which related to claim C would be struck out as soon as the case came
Oriental Remedies & Herbals Ltd vs Mrinal Kanti Chowdhury on 23 April, 2008
Petroleum Ltd v.
MV Monchegorsk ), the Court considered when a plaint could be struck out on it
not disclosing a cause of action ... circumstances in which the plaint can be struck out as
disclosing no cause of action has been considered by a Division Bench of
this Court
Idol Sri Sri Gokul Nath Jin vs The New Birbhum Coal Co. on 23 March, 1923
Court Fees Act. I thought it necessary to look into the plaint in order to enable me to decide it, and the learned Vakil ... plaintiff has not prayed for any consequential relief in his plaint. It struck me on reading the plaint that on the statement of facts
T. E. Thomson And Company Limited vs Musical Films Private Limited on 23 March, 2026
Chayan Gupta, learned advocate,
leave, as prayed for in the plaint, is struck off. The department shall once
2
again scrutinize the plaint
Srimati Mathura Sundari Dassi vs Haran Chandra Shaha And Ors. on 21 December, 1915
time. If he had put in a plaint which was ill-framed and that had been struck out by the learned Judge, according
Kanailal Das And Anr. vs Jiban Kanai Das And Anr. on 15 February, 1977
Unnecessary parties even according to the amended plaint as proposed and as such their names should be struck out from the suit. Mr. Roy Chowdhury
P.B. Shah And Co. And Ors. vs Chief Executive Officer And Ors. on 11 July, 1961
Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not arise. The plaint cannot therefore be rejected on the ground of absence of such notice ... City Architect, Corporation of Calcutta be struck off and deleted from the cause title of the plaint in the suit.
9. In the circumstances